Use of multi-criteria decision analysis in regulatory alternatives analysis: a case study of lead free solder.

نویسندگان

  • Timothy F Malloy
  • Peter J Sinsheimer
  • Ann Blake
  • Igor Linkov
چکیده

Regulators are implementing new programs that require manufacturers of products containing certain chemicals of concern to identify, evaluate, and adopt viable, safer alternatives. Such programs raise the difficult question for policymakers and regulated businesses of which alternatives are "viable" and "safer." To address that question, these programs use "alternatives analysis," an emerging methodology that integrates issues of human health and environmental effects with technical feasibility and economic impact. Despite the central role that alternatives analysis plays in these programs, the methodology itself is neither well-developed nor tailored to application in regulatory settings. This study uses the case of Pb-based bar solder and its non-Pb-based alternatives to examine the application of 2 multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to alternatives analysis: multi-attribute utility analysis and outranking. The article develops and evaluates an alternatives analysis methodology and supporting decision-analysis software for use in a regulatory context, using weighting of the relevant decision criteria generated from a stakeholder elicitation process. The analysis produced complete rankings of the alternatives, including identification of the relative contribution to the ranking of each of the highest level decision criteria such as human health impacts, technical feasibility, and economic feasibility. It also examined the effect of variation in data conventions, weighting, and decision frameworks on the outcome. The results indicate that MCDA can play a critical role in emerging prevention-based regulatory programs. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods offer a means for transparent, objective, and rigorous analysis of products and processes, providing regulators and stakeholders with a common baseline understanding of the relative performance of alternatives and the trade-offs they present.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach

The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...

متن کامل

A Fuzzy Approach for Projects Evaluation and Selection an Iranian Auto Manufacturer Case Study

Evaluating and selecting alternatives investment projects needs considering all relevant and important aspects. In traditional methods, the focus is just on tangible monetary criteria. Also in the traditional methods, either all the information’s about factors must be known precisely or sufficient objective data must be available for applying probability theory. In this paper, a combinative app...

متن کامل

Sensitivity Analysis in the QUALIFLEX and VIKOR Methods

The sensitivity analysis for multi-attribute decision making (MADM) problems is important for two reasons: First, the decision matrix as the source of the results of a decision problem is inaccurate because it sorts the alternatives in each criterion inaccurately. Second, the decision maker may change his opinions in a time period because of changes in the importance of the criteria and in the ...

متن کامل

The evaluation and prioritization framework of renewable energy sources and sustainable development in Iran, based on the multi-criteria decision-making method

Developing countries like Iran face increasing energy demands due to population growth and economic expansion. The country has numerous renewable energy resources that account for the majority of its total energy supply. As fossil fuel resources are running out, the government plans to increase its renewable energy share. Many studies have already been conducted on renewable resources. However,...

متن کامل

Vulnerability Analysis of Flood in Rangelands Using Multi Criteria Decision Analysis and Geographic Information System (Case Study: Gilard Basin, Damavand, Iran(

Flood disaster is considered as a major natural hazard due to its devastatingeffects on the affected areas. Determining the flood vulnerable areas is important fordecision makers in order to perform planning and management activities. GeographicalInformation System (GIS) is integrated with Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)used to analyze the flood vulnerable areas. The aim of this researc...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Integrated environmental assessment and management

دوره 9 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013